Pets911

Finding home for our nation's pets


PETS 911 Animal Crossroads Animal Welfare and Pet News Blog
SEARCH

Posts Tagged ‘dog’


Jodi Kasten of Salon.com writes about the imbalance between treatment of homeless cats and dogs

Wednesday, August 5th, 2009

dogcat-150x150 I’m all for spaying and neutering every companion animal. But, I have to wonder, would everyone think this is such a good idea if it were dogs? Snakes? Pot-bellied pigs? Cats do more than overpopulate. They can and DO attack people. I met a woman at the animal ER who was a concert pianist. I say “was” because she lost three fingers on her right hand when she tried to use a broom to shoo a cat out of her garage. The cat was hurt, so she trapped it in a box with tuna and brought it in, even though she would lose three fingers that night when she sought medical attention for herself.

Cats destroy property, claw paint jobs on cars (I speak from experience), ruin lawns and urinate all over everything they can find. So, why would it be okay to release 5,000 of them back into the community? How is this humane? Who will feed them? How would the community react to 5,000 stray dogs being released after they were captured?

She also talks about responsible pet ownership after pointing out how dogs are treated differently by the humane community. Part of this reason is that feral cat colonies are seen as less of a threat to populations than feral dog packs.

Jodi goes on to explain how people, feeling the bite of this economy, who can no longer take care of their pets really need to set aside their own feelings on the subject and try to get their pets into better homes. Even though the shelter system has excessive overpopulation and giving a pet away may result in its euthanasia, this is a poor excuse for simply turning an animal out into the city (or countryside.) Doing so exacerbates the already devastating problem of feral animals.

Less feral animals on the streets being picked up by animal control and rescued ideally means many more palates and less dogs and cats alone and uncared for who potentially face dire fates in county shelters or at the mercy of starvation, disease, and myriad other problems domesticated animals shouldn’t have to suffer.

Link, via Salon.com

Saving the McDowell Reservation Dogs – Progress Report

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009

Fort McDowell PuppyWe are happy to report that three adult dogs and two puppies have been rescued in the last few days.  There are still approximately 10-12 adult dogs and one puppy that need to be rescued among the dogs still out there.  Jan also believes there are two more litter of puppies out there as well and it is just a matter of time before the moms bring them out to meet her.

Currently, 2nd Chance Dog Rescue is fostering the three adult dogs and another volunteer is fostering the two puppies. They can still use help though!   If they can get more Foster Homes lined up they will be able to rescue the rest of the dogs more quickly.  Donations are also still desperately needed!

Fort McDowell dogsDiana Czarnecki, with 2nd Chance Dog Rescue  is coordinating the donations and fosters. Anyone interested in fostering can email Diana at cdczar96@aol.com.

Donations can be sent c/o: Lost Our Homes Foundation
Memo on Check should read: Donation for McDowell’s Res. Dogs
Send checks to: Diana Czar – 2449 W Angel Way, Queen Creek AZ 85242.

Related posts:
Extraordinary People – Saving the dogs that touch their souls, Debbie Schallan (Aug 3rd 2009)
McDowell Reservation Dogs Update – 10 to go, Debbie Schallan (Aug 14th 2009)

Extraordinary People – Saving the dogs that touch their souls

Monday, August 3rd, 2009

Dog on McDowell Rd.Over 2 years ago a woman named Jan began her mission to rescue dogs that were living on the Fort McDowell Reservation.  Most of these dogs were abandoned or dumped or just the result of overpopulation and no spay or neuter. They are not feral in the sense people think of feral. They are not wild or vicious. They are scared, lonely and just need to be taught about trust and love.

In the dead of night the Fort McDowell Reservation dogs begin to emerge from the dark shadows; foraging for food and water near the casino and service station.  Until recently, Jan was one woman alone, with a tender and loving hand; luring the hungry and scared dogs so that she could capture as many as she could find foster space for while providing food and water for the others.  She returns over and over to repeat the cycle.  Over the past two years Jan has successfully rescued 26 dogs and puppies.  Most of them went to a ranch foster home and were adopted out from there. Unfortunately, the owner of the ranch received complaints from the neighbors and can no longer foster.   Jan estimates that there are 15-20 more dogs/puppies that remain in need.  Sadly their time is running out as they are considered a nuisance by the Casino and Tribal Police.

Jan’s efforts have come to the attention of the Lost Our Home Pet Foundation and they have been helping with food for the dogs for the past nine months.  Recently 2nd “Chance” Dog Rescue heard of the plight and also teamed up to help in Jan’s effort to save the McDowell Reservation Dogs.   Rescuers from both of these organizations have begun to join Jan in her nighttime forays to care for the dogs and capture as many as they can take in for fostering.

They still need help though!  There is an enormous need for foster homes and they desperately need assistance with vet bills for vaccines, spay/neuter and any necessary medications for any unknown conditions they might have. So far they all appear pretty healthy, just hungry and thin!”

Diana Czarnecki is coordinating the donations and fosters. Anyone interested in fostering can email Diana at cdczar96@aol.com.

Donation can be sent c/o: Lost Our Homes Foundation
Memo on Check should read: Donation for McDowell’s Res. Dogs
Send checks to: Diana Czar – 2449 W Angel Way, Queen Creek AZ 85242.

Related posts:
Saving the McDowell Reservation Dogs – Progress Report, Debbie Schallan (Aug 4th 2009)
McDowell Reservation Dogs Update – 10 to go, Debbie Schallan (Aug 14th 2009)

Not just for humans anymore, dog flu vaccine developed

Friday, July 31st, 2009

dna-diagram With all the kerfuffle over the dangers of H1N1-A (otherwise known as “swine flu”) many people are now a little more educated about the flu virus and the implications of its various forms, and that different strains may even tend to infect different species. Meet H3N8, another mean ole’ flu, but rather than threatening humans, it could be a problem for your pooch instead.

From doggedhealth.com:

The H3N8 Virus was first identified in dogs in 2004 after an outbreak of the virus among Greyhounds at a Florida racetrack. The virus has now been found in 30 states plus the District of Columbia with Colorado, Florida, and the New York City metropolitan area having been hit hard. For the most part, the virus has been found in environments where dogs spend time in close quarters such as doggie daycare, kennels, shelters, dog parks and pet stores. Because the virus is new type of pathogen, dogs have no natural immunity and the virus can spread quickly.

According to an article in The Ledger, “Last week [during May 2009], the United States Department of Agriculture announced that it had approved the first vaccine for it.”

This flu appears to be particularly dangerous to dogs with short snub noses. Breeds with this particular feature include: Pug, Boston Terrier, Pekingese, Boxer, Bulldog, and Shih tzu. If you happen to enjoy the company of a dog who happens to have a snub nose, then you might be interested in talking to your veterinarian to see if this vaccine is right for your dog.

Link via doggedhealth.com, and link via The Ledger.

Denver, Colorado Pit Bull breed ban challenge moves forward

Wednesday, July 15th, 2009

Pit Bulls are perhaps one of the least understood breeds of dog. They have a long and sordid history of use as agressive fighting dogs, and maintain an arguably undeserved stigma in the public eye and the media. The remnants of this hysteria are reflected in legislation forwarded by multiple cities around the United States that ban the breed, and in some cases call for the “seizure” and “destruction” of beloved family pets based on these fears.

The City of Denver, Colorado placed and upheld one such breed-specific ban against Pit Bulls in 2005. Leading to a great deal of public outcry, espcially from dog lovers. MSNBC took to an article about how dog owners, shocked by the staggering euthanasia numbers, started up their own version of the Underground Canine Railroad: Denver pit bull ban leads to ‘dogs in hiding’ via MSNBC.

DENVER – A few weeks ago, two police cars and two animal control vehicles pulled up at the home of Stef’ny Steffan looking for her beloved 4-year-old pit bull, Xena. Seven officers hauled the animal off to the city shelter, putting her on death row.

Xena became an outlaw after Denver won a court fight and reinstated one of the toughest pit-bull bans in the nation. Since May, more than 380 dogs have been impounded and at least 260 destroyed — an average of more than three a day.

The numbers today show that since May 9, 2005, the City and County of Denver have euthanized more than 1,100 dogs persuant to the breed ban.

Recently, however, The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit accepted an appeal for consideration–over four years after the fact–based upon a lawsuit arguing against the ban. The Animal Legal Defense Fund filed an amicus curiae brief in support of the plaintiffs and the appeal is set to go forward to the District Court. The legalese of the entire proceeding make our eyes water, but the idea is simple and solid:

Given the Tenth Circuit’s ruling, the case will now proceed in the District Court, where the plaintiffs will be able to present their case that the Denver breed ban is not rationally related to a legitimate government interest. In other words, the plaintiffs will be arguing that while protecting the public from dangerous dogs is an important goal, the Denver breed ban is an irrational way to serve that goal and, therefore, should be unlawful.

We will all have to see how this one goes.

Link, via the ADLF Blog.

Warning about Spot-on Pesticide products for flea and tick control

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

I am always very interested in hearing about products that are potentially hazardous to the health my dog — after-all he is my baby! So when I came across the following information about spot-on pesticide products, I wanted to share the information with others who love their pets too! I also wonder if there are alternatives for flea/tick control that are not potentially harmful.

The EPA has reported that they are intensifying their evaluation of spot-on pesticide products for flea and tick control due to recent increases in the number of reported adverse reactions in pets treated with these products. Adverse reactions that have been reported range from mild effects such as skin irritation to more serious effects such as seizures and, in some cases, death of the pet.

According to the EPA, the majority of reports are related to flea and tick treatments with EPA-registered spot-on products. http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/health/prodname-reg.pdf Spot-on products are generally sold in tubes or vials and are applied to one or more localized areas such as down the spine or in specific spots. The EPA does note that many people use the products with no harm to their pets, but they are recommending the following precautions be taken when using these products:

  • Follow label directions and monitor pets for any signs of an adverse reaction after application.
  • Consult your veterinarian before using these products on weak, aged, pregnant or nursing pets, or on pets with a history of sensitivity to pesticide products.

At this point, the EPA is NOT issuing a recall or suggesting that the products not be used. They just want to advise pet owners to exercise caution and monitor their pet for adverse reactions.

To read the full report: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/health/flea-tick-control.html

Cat music video: Help!

Friday, February 6th, 2009

February, the very heels of Spay Day USA is upon us, so think about spaying/neutering your cats, dogs, rabbits, and other critters to help reduce pet overpopualation.

Find a Spay Day event near you.

January 24th Change a Pet’s Life Day

Friday, January 23rd, 2009

Hill’s Pet Nutrition has declared January 24th “Change a Pet’s Life Day.” On this day, in an effort to promote the adoption of millions of homeless pets, Hill’s will pay for the first ten adoptions at 300 of its partner animal shelters across the United States. They will also send new owners home with free Science Diet dog food (Hill’s donates free Science Diet food to shelters across the country to help get pets nutritionally ready for adoption). Teaming up with Hill’s is Kyra Sedgwick, star of TNT’s The Closer. As a lifelong animal lover and owner of adopted dogs, Sedgwick aims to raise awareness of pet overpopulation and encourage pet adoption and rescue.

There is also an interview with Kyra Sedgwick by the same blog author above. The big day is tomorrow and there’s events everywhere, possibly near you as well! To find a participating shelter you can use the search on feedingisbelieving.com.

Tell us your adoption story. Especially if you get out tomorrow and adopt an animal with the fee waived, change a pet’s life.

Link, via Jenna’s Dogs Blog

HSUS Feature: Selecting the Right Pet for Your Family and Making the Introduction

Tuesday, January 20th, 2009

Girl CockatielIf you have kids and are thinking of adopting a pet, here’s what you should consider to make the best choice for your family and your new friend.

Getting a new pet and introducing it to your family can be a challenging and rewarding experience—this becomes doubly-so if you happen to also have children. In this extensive article written by the HSUS the different issues and possible ramifications of a pet with children.

When I was growing up, the first pet that I knew was a beautiful Siamese cat named Sesi. She was sleek, slinky and generally stayed out of my way. I only have the vaguest memories of her now, sleeping on the couch, or standing just out of reach. She and I had few interactions and she didn’t have a lot of effect on me in my childhood except as something of a living decoration. To this day I still remember her shimmering eyes in pictures, white fur, and dark Siamese points.

The first pet that I had that actually became a responsibility, and thus a close friend, was Kit-ho, my Himalayan dwarf rabbit. I loved her to death—possibly chosen because she reminded me of Sesi in a way: white bunny, black paws, black nose, black ears, black tail. Living in the country she was basically my 4H project for a few years.

Over the years I grew through more rabbits and eventually a long-time closest friend cat, Cloud, who I will miss to this day. Although, I grew up with Cloud in high school to college and not just as a young child.

Introducing a pet and a child can create an unbreakable bond. It is the addition of what could be seen as basically a new member of the family who has different needs and adorations than a normal human companion. They add a varied number of emotions to the household and fill a niche that might otherwise have gone empty.

Link, via the HSUS.

The Cat House on the Kings

Friday, January 16th, 2009

This amazing rescue has a listing on PETS 911.

The Cat House on the Kings is California’s largest no-cage, no-kill, lifetime cat sanctuary and adoption center. Our mission is to place rescued cats and kittens into loving, permanent homes; to provide a safe, happy and healthy home for unwanted cats and kittens in a unique, no-cage facility; to prevent pet overpopulation through spaying and neutering; and to educate the public about responsible pet ownership.

Since its founding 16 years ago, The Cat House on the Kings has saved over 16,000 cats and 4,000 dogs (not counting the 40,000 animals we have spayed and neutered!) and currently cares for more than 700 cats and kittens!

The concept of no-cage sanctuaries for domestic animals, I must admit, is a new one to me. I spent too much time touring and visiting local county facilities that are quite the opposite—rows upon rows of cages, class cubicles to contain animals. The idea is particularly alluring, in fact, and I would be interested in seeing more of these crop up.

They have a gorgeous website with a great deal of information. Founded by Lynea Lattanzio—whose statement in the video about her mother not allowing her a kitten when she was growing up brought me to laughter—the Cat House on the Kings involves themselves in a lot of animal welfare education, volunteering, and other advocacy for domestic animals.

It is probably an amazing place to volunteer, and even with their huge, open facility, they have a fostering program for people take pets into their homes. This is good because as animals are waiting for adoption they need a place to be, but also it helps socialize potential adoption candidates to living in domestic situations.

Has anyone visited them? What do you think of this sort of approach to sanctuary and rescue efforts?

Visit, www.thecathouseonkings.com.